Death Penalty

Site Map

Main Page

Death penalty

Face of death

Social security
death index

Death record

Death and dying

Celebrity death

Death certificate

Life after death

Death poem

Near death
 experience

Death Directory

Related Links

Medicare
Retirement
Investments
Pensions
Government
Travel
Agencies
Departments
Social Security
Consultants
Business
Death Penalty

Death Penalty

Quick Links:
Social Security | Medicare | Medical | Health | Pension | Submit Articles | Medicaid




Capital Punishment: simply40 Deliberates Pros and Cons

by Nicole Galbreath

The capital punishment debate is an ongoing one, and engaging this debate is simply40.com [sic].

A few days ago death row inmate Charles Thompson escaped from a county jail in Houston, TX. A convicted killer, Thompson had just been re-sentenced to death for the second time. (Thompson has since been recaptured by authorities).

The capital punishment debate is an ongoing one, and engaging this debate is simply40.com [sic]. Cher Gruener and Doug Bird, simply40.com contributors, make valid cases both for and against the death penalty.

Gruener gives her rationale for supporting the death penalty: "Most people who are against capital punishment tend to only think about the prisoner and how cruel this act of capital punishment is to them, but they seem to forget about the murderer's victim and the rest of their family that is left behind to grieve with empty hearts." Another reason she provides supporting capital punishment is that once a person commits a murder, the chances of that person committing another murder are high.

Bird thinks that wrongful convictions and executions are a solid argument against the death penalty: "There have been and continue to be numerous inmates freed from death row over the past several years after further investigations either found them to be innocent, or that their trial verdict was seriously in doubt due to incompetent or corrupt judges and district attorneys, incompetent defence council, unqualified lab investigators or law enforcement officials with an agenda.The elimination of the death penalty is the only failsafe method."

This article, as well as links to other relevant resources discussing capital punishment and important contemporary news, is featured on simply40's web site.

Contact: Max Elliott
simply40, inc.
773.371.1522
http://www.simply40.com

http://www.simply40.com


What Happens to the Family Members of Death Row Inmates?

by Kenya Henderson

Capital Consequences: Families of the Condemned Tell Their Stories (Rutgers University Press) challenges readers to question the morality of a punishment that devastates innocent families.

Those who support capital punishment often claim they do so because it provides justice and closure for the victims’ families. However, attorney Rachel King reminds us that there are other victims who must be considered in the debate over the death penalty – the families of the condemned.

Capital Consequences: Families of the Condemned Tell Their Stories (Rutgers University Press) challenges readers to question the morality of a punishment that devastates innocent families. King tells the stories of families that have lost life savings supporting an accused, endured intense public and media scrutiny, and are struggling to live with the inhumane treatment their loved ones receive on death row. “This one-of-a-kind book is devoted solely to giving voice to death row family members, the forgotten victims of capital punishment,” says King, an attorney with the Capital Punishment Project of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Capital Consequences is a follow-up to King’s first book, Don’t Kill in Our Names: Families of Murder Victims Speak Out Against the Death Penalty (Rutgers University Press, 2003), in which members of the nationwide group, Murders Victims’ Families for Reconciliation, encouraged an end to capital punishment. In comparing both books, King contends that families of death row inmates suffer a unique form of grief. “Because their pain tends to elicit less attention and empathy than that of crime victims’ families, it becomes much more desperate and isolating.”

King’s latest book is a powerful reminder that tragic events have tragic consequences that far outreach their immediate victims. Capital Consequences also illustrates many flaws in the judicial system. Innocent people were wrongfully convicted, defense attorneys made mistakes, prosecutors withheld evidence, and the mentally ill and juveniles were sentenced to death.

Rachel King is an attorney with the Capital Punishment Project of the American Civil Liberties Union. She is a founding member of Alaskans Against the Death Penalty, and was active in a successful campaign to oppose reinstatement of the death penalty in Alaska. She has written on a variety of topics concerned with crime and capital punishment, and is author of Don’t Kill in Our Names: Families of Murder Victims Speak Out Against the Death Penalty (Rutgers University Press, 2003).

Capital Consequences: Families of the Condemned Tell Their Stories
By Rachel King
Cloth, $24.95. ISBN: 0-8135-3504-2
310 pages, 16 photographs, 6 1/8 x 9 1/4
Publication Date: February 2005

For more information, or to arrange an interview with the author, please contact Kenya Henderson at 732.445.7762, ext. 626, or e-mail protected from spam bots.

http://rutgerspress.rutgers.edu


 

Site Map | Site Map 2 | Web Map